Monday marks the second week of the privacy trial pitting former professional wrestler Hulk Hogan against the popular online pop culture website Gawker.
Hogan sued Gawker for publishing a video of the celebrity having sex with his friend’s girlfriend. However, Gawker claims the video was newsworthy because of Hogan’s celebrity status and his previous open discussion of his sex life. The question of newsworthiness matters because the privacy claim of publication of private facts is barred if a court deems the publication is newsworthy (or as courts sometimes call it, “of a legitimate public concern”).
In an article for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press’ magazine The News Media and the Law, I explored the question of how courts define newsworthiness. The article, Courts wrestle with defining newsworthiness in privacy cases, points out the various factors typically considered by courts. They are as follows:
- Does the information relate to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community?
- What is the social value of publishing the information?
- How far did the publication intrude into the private life of the subject?
- What is the subject’s status in the community? Did the subject voluntarily assume a position of public notoriety?
- Is there a connection between the information disclosed and the newsworthiness of the person or event involved in the publication?
- Not a legal consideration but a recognition of the reality of jury trials – What are the community standards and jury composition?
Here are some articles covering the first week of the trial:
- The Guardian: Hulk v. Gawker: “Bizarre case” could have profound consequences for free speech
- CNN Money: Hulk Hogan trial testimony gets raunchy
- Ad Week: What we learned during the first week of Hulk Hogan’s Gawker Trial