Supermodel Janice Dickinson joins others suing Bill Cosby for defamation, seeking vindication of sexual assault claims

Comedian Bill Cosby has largely remained mum in the wake of an onslaught of sexual assault claims in recent months – 39 according to Entertainment Tonight. In November, Supermodel Janice Dickinson came forward and asserted that Cosby sexually assaulted her in 1982. But because the statute of limitations expired on her claims and the other alleged victims, they have not been able to pursue criminal charges.

Now, Dickinson and at least three other women, including Tamara Green, are using defamation to seek recourse against Cosby and force him to discuss the allegations. Dickinson sued Cosby for defamation, false light, and infliction of emotional distress in Los Angeles County Superior Court on May 20, claiming that Cosby’s attorney, Martin Singer, defamed Dickinson by calling her a “liar” after she said Cosby assaulted her.

Dickinson told the Daily News:

“I want vindication. I’m doing it for women. I’ve been called a liar, and I’ve been re-victimized.”

Advertisements

Watching the watchdog: Columbia University investigates Rolling Stone’s “A Rape on Campus” story; Defamation suit possible

The press is the watchdog of government, providing a check on the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. But sometimes the Fourth Estate needs to be checked itself. This is what occurred recently as Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism conducted an investigation into a Nov. 19 Rolling Stone piece by Sabrina Rubin Erdely titled, “A Rape on Campus.” The article detailed how a student, referred to as “Jackie” in the article, was brutally raped at the University of Virginia by seven men at a fraternity party. The piece also highlighted the troubling rise in rape incidents on college campuses.

n-ROLLING-STONE-large570

Soon after publication, The Washington Post and other media outlets reported inaccuracies in the story. Later it was discovered that Erdely did not contact Jackie’s friends that were quoted in the article or any of the accused fraternity members. After the problems with the story surfaced, Rolling Stone sought Columbia University to undergo a full review of the article.

Columbia’s findings, called “An anatomy of a journalistic failure,” were released online April 5 and will be published in the upcoming issue of Rolling Stone. You can read the report here.

Erdely apologized, saying:

“I allowed my concern for Jackie’s well-being, my fear of re-traumatizing her, and my confidence in her credibility to take the place of more questioning and more facts.” “These are mistakes I will not make again.”

For Rolling Stone, the fallout is not quite over. Phi Kappa Psi, the University of Virginia fraternity mentioned in the original piece, is considering “all available legal action” against Rolling Stone, according to CNN Money. This could include a defamation suit by the fraternity.

Eugene Volokh thoroughly explains the elements and likelihood of a successful defamation claim against Rolling Stone in an article for The Washington Post‘s Volokh Conspiracy

In the end, this type of transparency from a media outlet that is typically counted on to provide transparency to others should be applauded. Other press entities should learn from the mistakes of the original story and also study the way in which Rolling Stone opened its doors to an independent third-party to review its actions and publish the findings.

Sometimes the watchdog needs to be watched.